#potential contract breach

𝘁𝗮𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗸𝘆

1个月前

#Crypto Pendle 把 YT 抽成从 5% 提高到 7% 这件事，属于项目方的自由。但有一个核心疑问：对现有的 YT token 是否生效。如果影响的话 —— 相当于你买了定期理财，还没到期，对方说服务费要再提高 2% ，这显然属于单方面毁约。如果不影响存量 YT —— 那就是双方互相选择，嫌贵就别用。目前已经询问了项目方，还没有得到明确答复。 #Crypto It's within Pendle's discretion to raise the YT fee from 5% to 7%. However, there's a core question: does this apply to existing YT tokens? If it does, it's like buying a fixed-term financial product, and before it matures, the other party says they're raising the service fee by another 2%. That's clearly a unilateral breach of contract. If it doesn't affect existing YT, then it's a mutual choice—if you think it's too expensive, just don't use it. We've already asked the project team but haven't received a clear answer yet.

#Pendle YT fee increase #potential contract breach #crypto service fee dispute #unanswered inquiry #investor concern